Correct the Change History entry of this version for Sprout.

Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>

protocol/protocol.tex

@@ -9615,12 +9615,6 @@ Peter Newell's illustration of the Jubjub bird, from \cite{Carroll1902}.
 \subparagraph{2018.0-beta-27}
 
 \begin{itemize}
-    \item No changes to \Sprout.
-\sapling{
-    \item Clarify that when validating a $\Groth$ proof, it is necessary to perform a
-          subgroup check for $\Proof{A}$ and $\Proof{C}$ as well as for $\Proof{B}$.
-    \item Correct the description of $\Groth$ batch verification to explicitly take account of
-          how verification depends on \primaryInputs.
     \item Notational changes:
           \begin{itemize}
             \item Use a superscript $^{\subgroupr}$ to mark the subgroup order, instead of a
@@ -9628,11 +9622,18 @@ Peter Newell's illustration of the Jubjub bird, from \cite{Carroll1902}.
             \item Use $\SubgroupGstar{}$ for the set of $\ParamG{r}$-order points in $\GroupG{}$.
             \item Mark the subgroup order in pairing groups, e.g. use $\SubgroupG{1}$ instead
                   of $\GroupG{1}$.
+\sapling{
             \item Make the bit-representation indicator $\Repr$ an affix instead of a superscript.
+} %sapling
           \end{itemize}
+\sapling{
+    \item Clarify that when validating a $\Groth$ proof, it is necessary to perform a
+          subgroup check for $\Proof{A}$ and $\Proof{C}$ as well as for $\Proof{B}$.
+    \item Correct the description of $\Groth$ batch verification to explicitly take account of
+          how verification depends on \primaryInputs.
+} %sapling
     \item Add Charles Rackoff, Rafail Ostrovsky, and Amit Sahai to the acknowledgements
           section for their work on \zeroKnowledgeProofs.
-} %sapling
 \end{itemize}
 
 \introlist